If I understand correctly, it's not that the computation itself is subjective, but that the interpretation of the results is. Like how things are represented i

If I understand correctly, it's not that the computation itself is subjective, but that the interpretation of the results is. Like how things are represented in lambda calculus - is this really an integer, or is it just a blob of function applications that has an interpretation consistent with being an integer? That part is subjective. Edit: to be more explicit, the parallel is "is that really a mind, or is it just a blob of molecules that has an interpretation consistent with being a mind?"