4 ms·

Forcing Arch model on eveyone is a perfect way for Linux to forever stay minority platform. There's a reason why most people do not run rolling distros. Might

Forcing Arch model on eveyone is a perfect way for Linux to forever stay minority platform. There's a reason why most people do not run rolling distros. Might be nice for hardcore fans, but good luck supporting anything there.

dleslie 6y ago
There is a very real shift happening from Ubuntu to Manjaro. If the sandboxed app package model is what you desire then there's already a great and popular Linux distro for you: Android.
- vetinari 6y ago
  Don't be surprised when all the mainstream distros switch to sandboxed app model as the preferred one. Distro-based packaging of the entire world is hiting the not enough manpower problem today and eventually will be eventually relegated to super fans distro only, with similar status as Amiga has today.
- sroussey 6y ago
  What is Manjaro?
  - sroussey 6y ago
    https://manjaro.org/ https://manjaro.org/
  - wyclif 6y ago
    Best way to describe it is: a user-friendly version of Arch that is based on the AUR (Arch User Repository).
    - sergeykish 6y ago
      As Arch Linux user I am completely confused. Looks like there is no official comparison page like [1]. Web search first entries [2], [3] gives another picture — more stable, graphical installer, graphical package manager, hardware detection, prepackaged desktop environments — that I can relate to. Nothing about "based on the AUR". Because it is liability. It is insecure, have to check PKGBUILD each install and update. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_compared_to_other_distributions https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_compared_to_other_... [2] https://linuxconfig.org/manjaro-linux-vs-arch-linux https://linuxconfig.org/manjaro-linux-vs-arch-linux [3] https://itsfoss.com/manjaro-vs-arch-linux/ https://itsfoss.com/manjaro-vs-arch-linux/
      - wyclif 6y ago
        I should have been more clear. In terms of package management Manjaro has access to the AUR, but it's unsupported. Manjaro does not have access to official Arch repositories. Sorry, I should have said "based on Arch" not "based on the AUR." https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
        sergeykish 6y ago
        Ok, I would not recommend Arch as a first Linux distro, Arch based and easy to start is a plus. That said I've seen troubled Manjaro user on xmonad IRC, we tracked problem to AUR package, it worked fine on Arch.
        wyclif 6y ago
        Yeah, Arch Linux is definitely not for beginners. The install process alone is hands-on and requires users to be experienced with command line configuration. Arch is for power users who want a ports-based Linux with great package management (pacman).
- wyclif 6y ago
  I've observed a lot of recent Manjaro adoption lately (I don't know what the real numbers are). Anecdotal, but in my social circles I'm seeing people moving from Ubuntu to either Manjaro or Arch.

dleslie 6y ago

There is a very real shift happening from Ubuntu to Manjaro. If the sandboxed app package model is what you desire then there's already a great and popular Linux distro for you: Android.

vetinari 6y ago
Don't be surprised when all the mainstream distros switch to sandboxed app model as the preferred one. Distro-based packaging of the entire world is hiting the not enough manpower problem today and eventually will be eventually relegated to super fans distro only, with similar status as Amiga has today.
sroussey 6y ago
What is Manjaro?
- sroussey 6y ago
  https://manjaro.org/ https://manjaro.org/
- wyclif 6y ago
  Best way to describe it is: a user-friendly version of Arch that is based on the AUR (Arch User Repository).
  - sergeykish 6y ago
    As Arch Linux user I am completely confused. Looks like there is no official comparison page like [1]. Web search first entries [2], [3] gives another picture — more stable, graphical installer, graphical package manager, hardware detection, prepackaged desktop environments — that I can relate to. Nothing about "based on the AUR". Because it is liability. It is insecure, have to check PKGBUILD each install and update. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_compared_to_other_distributions https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_compared_to_other_... [2] https://linuxconfig.org/manjaro-linux-vs-arch-linux https://linuxconfig.org/manjaro-linux-vs-arch-linux [3] https://itsfoss.com/manjaro-vs-arch-linux/ https://itsfoss.com/manjaro-vs-arch-linux/
    - wyclif 6y ago
      I should have been more clear. In terms of package management Manjaro has access to the AUR, but it's unsupported. Manjaro does not have access to official Arch repositories. Sorry, I should have said "based on Arch" not "based on the AUR." https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
      - sergeykish 6y ago
        Ok, I would not recommend Arch as a first Linux distro, Arch based and easy to start is a plus. That said I've seen troubled Manjaro user on xmonad IRC, we tracked problem to AUR package, it worked fine on Arch.
        wyclif 6y ago
        Yeah, Arch Linux is definitely not for beginners. The install process alone is hands-on and requires users to be experienced with command line configuration. Arch is for power users who want a ports-based Linux with great package management (pacman).
wyclif 6y ago
I've observed a lot of recent Manjaro adoption lately (I don't know what the real numbers are). Anecdotal, but in my social circles I'm seeing people moving from Ubuntu to either Manjaro or Arch.