3 ms·
Having worked in mathematics for 10+ years, I can tell for sure, that the least problem you will face when trying to understand Calabi-Yau manifolds are the nam
by heinrichhartman 6y ago
Having worked in mathematics for 10+ years, I can tell for sure, that the least problem you will face when trying to understand Calabi-Yau manifolds are the naming conventions.
Unwrapping the last term alone is a multi-year endevour if you start from scratch:
> [A] manifold is a locally ringed space, whose structure sheaf is locally isomorphic to the sheaf of continuous (or differentiable, or complex-analytic, etc.) functions on Euclidean space [IR^n]. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold#Mathematical_definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold#Mathematical_definiti...
Note that definition, does barely use inventor's names and is still very dense and hard to unwrap.
I never found naming conventions to be a notable problem.
- FabHK 6y agoAgreed. Even if a relatively short description is possible ("complete normed vector space"), if a concept is used often enough, it might be named (in the case of the example, "Banach space") - what's the problem with that? In daily life, we don't say "Pull the horizontal surface suitable to sit on closer to the somewhat higher horizontal surface suitable to perform office tasks on", we say "Pull the chair closer to the desk", because we have given these concepts names.