3 ms·
The author certainly has a point. However, when he mentioned rote memorization I was reminded how easy it came to me to remember all these names. I majored in p
by mr_mitm 6y ago
The author certainly has a point. However, when he mentioned rote memorization I was reminded how easy it came to me to remember all these names. I majored in physics and minored in math, and at some point I realized how many theorems and mathematical objects I knew that were named after a person without sitting down and trying to memorize them. As soon as the concept of, say, a Taylor series, Hilbert space, Schrödinger equation, the Schwarzschild radius or the Tesla unit was introduced, the name stuck immediately.
Then again, I could add another argument as to why naming things after persons is bad: it's ridiculous how many things have been named after Euler [1] or Gauß [2]. But I'm not aware that this causes widespread confusion. Maybe it's not a problem.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Leonhard_Euler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Leo...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Carl_Friedrich_Gauss https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Car...
- Sharlin 6y ago(The author is a she, by the way.)
- mantap 6y agoIn terms of memorisation, naming something after a person is very beneficial. The ease of remembering something is a function of how many associations you can make to it. For instance, for a person you can associate with their name: 1. Where they lived. 2. What they looked like. 3. Interesting information about their life For example you might remember Galois lived in France, he looked like a kid and he died in a duel. If someone just makes up a word it's going to be much harder to remember because there's no attachment points for associations.