> There is plenty of evidence - of no impact. There is plenty of evidence of the opposite in fact and is not difficult to find at all. We can choose to close t

> There is plenty of evidence - of no impact. There is plenty of evidence of the opposite in fact and is not difficult to find at all. We can choose to close the eyes to not see it, but the truth is stubborn: Techa river (Russia): Used as dumpster from dismantled nuclear submarines until 2004. 25 times more probable than normal of having limb and organ malformation in newborn babies from people living there, plus a bonus 40% increase of probability of having cancer. This is the harvest of just 50 years of activity. What would you call that?