3 ms·

Let them work hard even if you have nothing to hide. I'd refuse to disclose any private info up until the law requires me to. Intimidation is a trick they use t

Let them work hard even if you have nothing to hide. I'd refuse to disclose any private info up until the law requires me to. Intimidation is a trick they use to cut down on work.

dylan604 6y ago
Encrypt everything. We know they keep copies of encrypted data for a long time hoping for the day that breaking the encryption becomes easy for reading later. In the meantime, flood everything with mundane data, but encrypted. Make it expensive for them to keep it all, and the an absolute waste of time when they do get it decrypted.
- kevin_thibedeau 6y ago
  Throw in some legitimate random data to really mess with them. Everybody needs some good entropy seed material.
0xdeadb00f 6y ago
> I'd refuse to disclose any private info up until the law requires me to. This doesn't work as well as you'd expect. I know Queensland law requires you to unlock your phone for a cop, or you face prison time. I'd expect there's similar laws for disclosure of encryption keys. I don't know if I'm willing to "make it hard for them" if that means facing jail time.
- cmroanirgo 6y ago
  This is true in relation to a search warrant afaik: https://www.hallpayne.com.au/blog/2019/january/mobile-phone-access-by-police/ https://www.hallpayne.com.au/blog/2019/january/mobile-phone-... >Judge North’s comments do make it clear, however, that if you answer questions where you acknowledge ownership of a mobile phone, then there is a potential for self-incrimination.