4 ms·
What’s interesting about these mega contracts is that I’m sure there is consideration of second-order and long term effects, beyond the contract itself. E.g. I
by amscanne 6y ago
What’s interesting about these mega contracts is that I’m sure there is consideration of second-order and long term effects, beyond the contract itself.
E.g. If awarding the JSF contract to Boeing would have caused Lockheed to go out of business, that could be quite bad in the long run, as now you have just a single major aerospace provider. As long as both planes meet the requirements and are competitive, I could certainly imagine that tipping the scales.
I think the same argument could easily apply here. AWS is the market leader by far. As long as the price and services are competitive and both meet requirements, giving the boost to #2 keeps the market more competitive for the long-haul.
Occam´s razor would suggest that there probably was some influence. But there was also likely influence in the initial creation of the RFP, favoring AMZ. In any case, the FUD in this post about ‘inferior technology’ is pretty effective at wiping away any sympathy for Amazon that I might have had..
- ponker 6y agoThere is also a lot of evidence though that the grownups in the room have started ignoring Trump. Look at how many of his cronies have been indicted by his own Department of Justice.
- giantg2 6y agoThe Boeing-Lockheed example isn't the best. Most defense contractors subcontract portions of the work, even to companies they competed against. But I do agree that a systems thinking approach is usually taken, contemplating the N-order impacts. Also, I'm pretty sure that some agencies do use AWS already (or recently did). So I don't think it's fully exclusive.