7 ms·
VMware launches Node.js, Rails and Spring PaaS
- mcantelon 15y ago"the industry’s first open platform as a service". First? How is this different from Heroku and other such folks?
- ctide 15y agoThe stack is open source: http://cloudfoundry.org/ http://cloudfoundry.org/
- mcantelon 15y agoImpressive! Now their string of open source acquisitions makes sense.
- thesethings 15y agoIt also supports multiple frameworks/languages.
- jasonmccay 15y agoTechnically, so does Heroku. CloudFoundry does offer Java support, which is a bit different. I am interested to see how it looks once it gets out of beta. I am betting it will be a solid platform, but after seeing the demo a few months ago at RubyConf, it did feel like a model I had seen before.
- mrkurt 15y agoAs someone who would like to give Heroku a bit of a twisting sometimes, I'm all for it (even if that's all it is). Having a company like VMware offer to run my Rack and Node apps side by side would be useful.
- ezmobius 15y agoWhen was the last time Heroku accepted a pull request from you? ;)
- jasonmccay 15y agoHey there, Ezra! :) Agreed...the open aspect of it and how it morphs through the community will be very interesting. Looking forward to it.
- jasonmccay 15y agoAs a follow up, my initial response came out a bit more snarky than I intended. Sorry about that.
- ezmobius 15y agoNo worries and I am good friends with the Heroku guys and I fully give them props for lots of the pioneering ideas in this space. This project means to take it further though and be one everyone's cloud operating system, the Linux of cloud OS's if you will. It will live or die based on the open source can build around it. I fully intend to try to build this community and nurture it so this project flourishes. The personal PaaS angle is what I'm most excited about. Whatch for my technical blog posts tomorrow after I get some rest for more info...
- incomethax 15y agoIt doesn't seem like its different people from Heroku. If you've seen Mark Benioff's cloudforce pitch (link below), he mentions that they're partnering with VMWare to launch a PaaS similar to Heroku (which they acquired in December). That said, I think its a bit surprising that VMWare is launching this under their branding - the machinations of large corporations continuously confound me. http://www.salesforce.com/video/cloud2011-nyc.jsp http://www.salesforce.com/video/cloud2011-nyc.jsp
- justincormack 15y agoaccording to the register: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/12/vmware_open_sources_platform_as_service_code/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/12/vmware_open_sources_... "Cloud Foundry serves as the basis for the VMforce platform cloud VMware is building in tandem with Salesforce.com. Therefore, Chen tells us, developers will be able to readily move applications between VMforce and other Cloud Foundry services" So they are both apparently releasing differently branded versions of the same stack. There is no history in the git repos, so not clear if any of the code comes from Heroku.
- ezmobius 15y agoNone of the code comes from Heroku at all.
- nlake44 15y agoI'm on the AppScale team (http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu) and it's been open source for several years now.
- antirez 15y agoWith support for MySql, MongoDB, and Redis on the DB side :)
- samstokes 15y agoWould it be a fair guess that CloudFoundry will support Redis Cluster too when it is released?
- antirez 15y agoThat's the idea, I'm taking this in mind while developing redis cluster, for instance a must is the ability to create and manage clusters by using redis-trib in scripts, so that it is possible to have one click provisioning of a Redis cluster of N nodes automatically. You can see that in the unstable branch there is already some initial version of redis-trib I'm developing in this days to allow this kind of things.
- samstokes 15y agoThanks for the reply - sounds like this will be a really useful combo for operating large Redis deployments.
- acconrad 15y agoThis seems fine for fun apps or testing, but I would be incredibly concerned to agree with these terms of service if I was running production software or charging for it. From their terms of service: b. Your Applications and Code. If You create online applications or program code using the Service, You authorize Cloud Foundry to host, copy, transmit, display and adapt such applications and program code, solely as necessary for Cloud Foundry to provide the Service in accordance with this Agreement. Subject to the above, Cloud Foundry acquires no right, title or interest from You or Your licensors under this Agreement in or to such applications or program code, including any intellectual property rights therein. ...and yet somehow you own exclusive rights to the data.
- mrkurt 15y agoThat seems pretty reasonable, and maybe even necessary. If they're copying your code around or distributing it to users, they may need those rights. "..solely as necessary for Cloud Foundry to provide the Service..." is the key point, there.
- acconrad 15y agoJust so I understand you correctly, does that imply that their intention is to prevent being sued if they need to change your code in order for it to work on the platform, in the event of say, an upgrade of their core infrastructure? If so, that makes a lot more sense. Thanks.
- mrkurt 15y agoI think their intention is to not be sued if they need to redistribute your code in order to run the platform. This means they might need to copy it to other instances, send copyrightable assets (javascript, css, images) to users as is, etc. But yes, it would also give them the right to change things as necessary to run the service. It could cover installing additional plugins like Heroku does, or munging config files, or even doing things like partially compiling source to some target. By default, they really don't have the legal right to do a bunch of those things. Some of them are vague and arguable since hosting doesn't exactly fit into copyright law all the time, so companies will sometimes put in clauses like this that explicitly grant them rights that might otherwise seem like common sense. It may be obvious to you and me, but it's now spelled out in an agreement "just in case".
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoNo price given. I'll keep using AppEngine until someone at least comes close to matching their freemium model.
- thesethings 15y agoPreso just ended, small update: there will be both free + pay service. For now, everything free. So we still don't have details, but we know the model they are pursuing.
- tga 15y agoWell, to make the license question easier, their invite request form is utterly unusable on Android. I apparently need to 'scroll to the bottom' to submit to a dubiously enforceable license before even being allowed to see their beta, exciting action made anyway imposible by the broken design. Node.js notwithstanding, this tastes from the start like a proper enterprise service.
- lt 15y agoOn the iOS you can scroll textareas and iframes using two fingers. I imagine it should be possible on Android too.
- tga 15y agoIf only it were that easy.. For the record, the default Android browser seems to (still) have an issue with the 'overflow' CSS property, causing overflow:auto and overflow:scroll to show up as overflow:hidden. http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=2911 http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=2911
- rmoriz 15y agoI was suprised no virtualisation is included in the solution (or I did not find the parts in the github repos). Seriously, shared-hosting is so 1996 from a security perspective. So for me It will be "just" an "internal cloud" solution and maybe replace capistrano. Still, puppet and chef will do the "physical"/"system" provisioning for my customers and my projects.
- justincormack 15y agoAs far as I can make out so far it is not designed to be multitenant. Each client gets an instance for their apps which can consist of multiple VMs. Based on interpreting the install guide here https://github.com/cloudfoundry/vcap https://github.com/cloudfoundry/vcap
- ezmobius 15y agoIt currently supports multi-tenant and single tenant, you choose when you set it up. Currently the multi-tenancy is based on locked down unix users and permissions and other system hardening, pretty much same approach Heroku uses so you judge whether that's multi-tenant or not. We are looking into lightweight containers like lxc and friends for another implementation of the multi-tenancy.
- piotrSikora 15y agoIn web hosting, virtualization is usually excuse for bad design. Personally I'm glad that VMware (virtualization company!) managed to pull this without it.
- FooBarWidget 15y agoVirtualization isn't the only way to isolate apps. What happened to good old Unix user accounts? It seems ridiculous to me to allocate entire kernels and OS runtimes per user/app when they can just share all that stuff and have the kernel isolate access and divide resources.
- rmoriz 15y ago
- rmoriz 15y agoLink to github repos https://github.com/cloudfoundry https://github.com/cloudfoundry
- hasenj 15y agoVery interesting. I'm glad more Heroku-like services are sprining up, specially with support for Node.js This is a much needed service, and although some solutions already exist, they're far from perfect, and there's certainly lots of space for competition.
- tlrobinson 15y agoIt definitely makes sense for VMware to build and open source this, since their core business is selling the virtualization software this runs on top of (I assume). Though I wonder how much of it is really VMware specific, or if it would be relatively easy to port to Xen, etc. Edit: actually it appears it might be agnostic to the virtualization layer.
- ezmobius 15y agoIt doesn't care about virtualization layer, runs on raw hardware too.
- EwanToo 15y agoIt seems that VMware's long term view is that virtualisation itself is a commodity (which it is, KVM and Xen are both "good enough" already), and it's going to be the management of IT resources which is financially lucrative in the future. Their core business today is selling vSphere 4 management with ESXi as the hypervisor, I think they see their core business in 10 years as being the management layer for your entire IT infrastructure, wherever it runs.
- Andys 15y agoI hate it when this happens. ESXi is excellent, I think one of the best x86 kernels in existence. The management software is nowhere near on par with it; it is finicky Windows software that doesn't match the hypervisor's speed or reliability. The long-rumoured Linux version of the management platform still has not materialised.
- EwanToo 15y agoThe Linux version of vCenter is part of vSphere 5. There's also a cross platform version of the vSphere client, though it's written in Adobe Flex, so who knows how good that'll be..
- dabeeeenster 15y agoWhat do they mean by "Spring applications"? That's quite obscure. Do they mean they handle .war J2EE applications? Or they only support Spring libraries?
- ezmobius 15y agoWe can take any .war file that runs on Tomcat, even jruby apps. Not just spring.
- dabeeeenster 15y agoI really think you should make this clear. We're a Java shop, but we use all sorts of frameworks; play, spring, homegrown, but they all build to .war. This is an interesting product to me, but from the marketing material it's not obvious...
- ezmobius 15y agoI agree and I'm working with marketing folks to make this stuff more clear. There are just so many details to get a release like this out the door that some things didn't get as much attention as they deserved. But your point is well taken and I'll try to get the message cleared up as it is pretty cool IMHO. Also look for some more technical deep dive blog posts on my blog by tomorrow at http://brainspl.at http://brainspl.at where I will clarify a bunch of this stuff.(right after I get some sleep;)
- jwr 15y agoWhich would mean that Clojure apps would qualify as well - now that might be interesting. We're running our apps on Amazon EC2 right now, managing Redis ourselves.
- vorg 15y agoMaybe you should mention Grails, after all, VMware does own it.
- wattersjames 15y agoIf you are in the bay area on the 13th the Cloud Foundry team is hosting its first meetup. Come ask the tough questions to engineering: http://www.meetup.com/cloudcomputing/events/17187485/ http://www.meetup.com/cloudcomputing/events/17187485/
- justinksd 15y agoWas anybody else surprised that Ryan Dahl actually spoke at the CloudFoundry Webinar? Seems like a conflict with Joyents no.de hosting solution.
- steilpass 15y agoI actually thought Joyent would play a bigger role.
- neeleshs 15y agoAny chance of getting Python/Django support in the near future?
- nateaune 15y agoIt'll be interesting to see if/when Python/Django support emerges for CloudFoundry. In the meantime, the DjangoZoom PaaS provides automated deployments of your Django app in as little as 30 seconds. Sign up for the private beta and mention that you saw this Hacker News thread to get priority in the queue. http://djangozoom.com http://djangozoom.com