3 ms·
You've got some good points -- but on the other hand, they're not doing anything Craigslist or eBay hasn't been doing for ten years now. Even some of their othe
by jordan0day 16y ago
You've got some good points -- but on the other hand, they're not doing anything Craigslist or eBay hasn't been doing for ten years now. Even some of their other examples (buying better tickets while at the all-star game) can tend to run afoul of the rules (tickets are often non-transferrable), but I suppose the market-maker isn't who gets in trouble for such transgressions. Likewise, it's the Tesla owners responsibility to get the rider to sign some waiver saying they won't sue if they get hurt during the ride, not Zaarly's. They're just formalizing the "hey man, would you give me a ride in that sweet car? I'll pay you!" type of interaction that has occurred throughout history.
- crikli 16y agoThe problem is that Zaarly doesn't actually have to be liable. Lawsuits cost defendants a ton of money and there are plenty of hungry PI attorneys out there that will litigate in hopes of contingency fees.