3 ms·
huh, one more : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24109437 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24109437
by bluu00 6y ago
huh, one more : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24109437 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24109437
- kens 6y agoI should point out that the article you linked to is a different article by CPU Shack. The reason why two articles on the Nanoprocessor came out in a short time is that the chip's developer recently gave the masks and documents to CPU Shack, who wrote about it. Then I got the mask scans, so I wrote about the details of the chip. So you should read the CPU Shack article too, since it covers different aspects of the Nanoprocessor: http://www.cpushack.com/2020/08/09/the-forgotten-ones-hp-nanoprocessor/ http://www.cpushack.com/2020/08/09/the-forgotten-ones-hp-nan...