3 ms·
It seems every StackExchange site is overrun by sophomoric gatekeepers, searching for (& competing with each other?) to find any possible reason to shoot-down q
by gojomo 6y ago
It seems every StackExchange site is overrun by sophomoric gatekeepers, searching for (& competing with each other?) to find any possible reason to shoot-down questions.
It's so much easier to hit that 'downvote' or 'close' button than to actually try to understand the asker, or compose a meaningful answer, or even explain clearly why a question might truly need work.
So, I see a lot of 'closes' from people who hardly ever answer any questions, and plenty by people who simply don't understand the question's domain enough to see that yes, that is a meaningful question with a compact, well-matched answer. And once closed, it seems no one really looks at 'reopen' requests, even after the question text improved.
- tracker1 6y agoNot speaking to this question... but I largely don't even participate in stackoverflow anymore as most questions seem to be what should be an RTFA, have an existing answer, or homework help for what is way beyond the scope of the site. It's frustrating when 9/10 of the questions aren't even deserving of an answer (at least that's my opinion) for the above reasons.