3 ms·
I agree: bias is part of human nature, and cannot be fully removed from news. Given that, what's wrong with Stars & Stripes? Also, I think GP question was pret
by hackyhacky 6y ago
I agree: bias is part of human nature, and cannot be fully removed from news. Given that, what's wrong with Stars & Stripes?
Also, I think GP question was pretty reasonable. Why are you trying to infer an "agenda"? It makes you look unreasonable.
Everyone has their own opinion. It's not a leading question.
- barnesto 6y agoWhat "agenda" would that be? All I said was S&S is biased in my opinion... after having read the periodical on the regular for the last 32 years. Based on your other questions, I don't think it's me coming off as unreasonable. Your mileage will vary, obviously.
- hackyhacky 6y agoWhen you accused GP of using a "leading question," when he asked your where you get your news, it sounds like you cynically interpret any question as an attack. You can tell me which agenda you're assuming on the part of your interlocutor. And I've asked you a few times for evidence of bias in S&S. I understand that it's your opinion that S&S is biased, but surely that opinion was formed on the basis of evidence.... right?