3 ms·
Sure, we can have both a zadeh, and a bayes ;) I'm not sure if I find Koskos argument convincing, however one could also argue that a bayes is a subtype of a z
by j-pb 6y ago
Sure, we can have both a zadeh, and a bayes ;)
I'm not sure if I find Koskos argument convincing, however one could also argue that a bayes is a subtype of a zadeh ;)
http://sipi.usc.edu/~kosko/Fuzziness_Vs_Probability.pdf http://sipi.usc.edu/~kosko/Fuzziness_Vs_Probability.pdf
- dragonwriter 6y agoBayesian probability is, from a certain perspective, a fuzzy logic but the operators of Bayesian logic are not the operators Zadeh’s fuzzy logic. Since types define operators as well as values, I'd argue that a “bayes(ian)” type should be distinct from a “zadeh(an)” type, even if they might usefully have a common “fuzzy_membership” supertype.