6 ms·
The reason for the controversy is there are indications that Zero Hedge may be an outlet for a state level actor. See here for one perspective. https://newrepub
by vajrabum 6y ago
The reason for the controversy is there are indications that Zero Hedge may be an outlet for a state level actor. See here for one perspective. https://newrepublic.com/article/156788/zero-hedge-russian-trojan-horse https://newrepublic.com/article/156788/zero-hedge-russian-tr...
- opportune 6y agoThis is a really good article. I guess the best way to get top-notch investigative journalism is to personally threaten a journalist
- kaycebasques 6y agoWow, back when I visited ZH I would always be in this cognitively dissonant place where I was getting a lot of value out of the market-related articles and cringing at all the conspiratorial political stuff. I can't believe I never considered the idea that it's sponsored by the Kremlin.
- blahblah3737 6y agoread the article, it's not very convincing to be honest. it's a long winded biography of the owner of the site who is bulgarian. the evidence is that the reporting content is right-leaning/conspiratorial and that he is bulgarian basically.
- rapsey 6y agoOr maybe they are being framed for calling out the bullshit in other mainstream media.
- vkou 6y agoSome of their work is, indeed, calling out bullshit. Much of it is bonkers-insane, ah, bullshit of a different flavour. People wouldn't be reading the second, if they didn't print the first.
- Natsu 6y ago> Zero Hedge may be an outlet for a state level actor. So is the NPR and the BBC, so I'm not sure how much this means. It's best to take what everyone says with a grain of salt and piece things together from the evidence presented. I certainly don't believe everything posted by any of the outlets. ZH definitely plays more fast and loose with things, though.
- dlp211 6y agoHow is NPR an outlet for state level actors? Which state level actors?
- Natsu 6y agoThey're an arm of the US Government. If that's not a state, I don't know what is.
- nr2x 6y ago"While NPR does not receive any direct federal funding, it does receive a small number of competitive grants from CPB and federal agencies like the Department of Education and the Department of Commerce. This funding amounts to approximately 2% of NPR's overall revenues." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPR#Funding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPR#Funding
- Natsu 6y agoOther quotes from the same article: "NPR differs from other non-profit membership media organizations, such as AP, in that it was established by an act of Congress[2] and most of its member stations are owned by government entities (often public universities)." "Typically, NPR member stations receive funds through on-air pledge drives, corporate underwriting, state and local governments, educational institutions, and the federally funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). In 2009, member stations derived 6% of their revenue from federal, state and local government funding, 10% of their revenue from CPB grants, and 14% of their revenue from universities.[24][41]" Depending on whether the universities are public or private, this accounts for something approaching 30% of their budget. So that 2% figure doesn't really give the full picture.