I would have said that Zig is for Rust like C is for C++. But I would be wrong. Zig has all the power of C++, but it doesn't hide anything from you, it is not a

I would have said that Zig is for Rust like C is for C++. But I would be wrong. Zig has all the power of C++, but it doesn't hide anything from you, it is not as complex as C++ and it is unsafe. In the future, probably Zig will be the choice for things that require lots of unsafe components and Rust otherwise. There was also an article about this in which the author said that "unsafe zig is safer than unsafe rust".[1] Moreover, I am also interested in F*, the ability to generate efficient C, ASM and WASM code from it looks promising. [1] https://andrewkelley.me/post/unsafe-zig-safer-than-unsafe-rust.html https://andrewkelley.me/post/unsafe-zig-safer-than-unsafe-ru...