More Orwellian than deceitful, because they're using "liked" to represent the aggregate when "likes" is already its own metric, which happens to be lower than t

More Orwellian than deceitful, because they're using "liked" to represent the aggregate when "likes" is already its own metric, which happens to be lower than the aggregate. It's kind of funny really - 'did you mean "liked" or "likes"?'