4 ms·
It's still not really "correct" IMO, I think it needs to be "UnitIntervalValue" as someone said above. I'd expect that things of type "UnitInterval" would be in
by throwaway287391 6y ago
It's still not really "correct" IMO, I think it needs to be "UnitIntervalValue" as someone said above. I'd expect that things of type "UnitInterval" would be intervals, not values. "UnitInterval" would be like calling the type "Int32Range" instead of "Int32".
(NB: "In real life" I would never "correct" someone for calling it "UnitInterval", it's good enough -- but given this is a pure discussion of semantics...)
- kelnos 6y agoSure, that's fair. I was more talking about it being better to name the type a particular thing, rather than encoding the type in the variable name.