3 ms·
That's a very good observation. We still could need a (new) term for this common type. Maybe floatbit, softbit, qubit(sic), pot, unitfloat, unit01 or just uniti
by singularity2001 6y ago
That's a very good observation. We still could need a (new) term for this common type. Maybe floatbit, softbit, qubit(sic), pot, unitfloat, unit01 or just unitinterval as suggested?
This begs an interesting tangential question: Which programming languages allow such resticted intervals as types?
type percentage:=int[0,100]
type hexdigit:=int[0,15]
…
since this might be overkill, sane programming languages might encourage assert statements inside the functions.
- m12k 6y agofloatbit is good starting idea, but maybe too long to be catchy. How about a flit?