Also, compiling to Lua is not a bad option. Its syntax (http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#8 http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#8) is quite straig

Also, compiling to Lua is not a bad option. Its syntax (http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#8 http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html#8) is quite straightforward, and it's designed to compile rapidly (due to using table as a JSON-like serialization format). While writing out a (kinda silly) benchmark a while ago, it struck me that, while Python's compiler is rather slow, Lua's has very little impact on the overall runtime. Between that and the lack of weird corner cases in the grammar, I'm reasonably comfortable doing string-eval metaprogramming in Lua, something I would never do in Python. Benchmark (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1800396 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1800396) and commentary (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1804166 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1804166).