3 ms·
But this link shows exactly why plain chemical tests are superior, no? The poster's question was about the conflict, not the interpretation of the chemical tes
by theon144 6y ago
But this link shows exactly why plain chemical tests are superior, no?
The poster's question was about the conflict, not the interpretation of the chemical test.
>FRERs can pick up hCG as low as 7. Digitals require >40. Try with a digital in another week!
This seems to me like you're replacing an analogue, more precise reading with a binary, easier to read, imprecise reading?
- mrtksn 6y agoSuperior sensitivity != Superior UX. Yeah, sure if you know what you are doing observing chemical reaction can be much better. It's like the difference between consumer tools and industrial tools. Full manual espresso machines are superior from the perspective of a coffee nerd or professional. Nespresso machines with capsules are superior from the perspective of the person who wants the coffee but doesn't fancy learning making one.
- srtjstjsj 6y agoThe whole point of the paper is that it IS a consumer UX for the chemical reaction. It's just analog instead of digital.
- mrtksn 6y agoIt simply means that the paper is not as good as digital from UX perspective. This doesn’t mean that the paper is unusable but obviously creates some confusion that the digital doesn’t.