4 ms·
Which isn't even correct because systemd consists of many individual parts that do their thing and are replacable. But because they all share the "systemd-*" na
by raziel2p 6y ago
Which isn't even correct because systemd consists of many individual parts that do their thing and are replacable. But because they all share the "systemd-*" naming pattern people think they're the same piece of software.
Would be funny if people made the same complaint about the various GNU core utils because those are all installed from the same package on most (all?) distros.
- fsflover 6y agoPlease show independent working implementations of those "replaceable individual parts". AFAIK people who tried to do it found too many obstacles like undocumented or inconvenient API.