> I've never met any Ada programmer before who thought Ada does not have a relatively long and steep learning curve. You'd be the first I've met. Make that at

> I've never met any Ada programmer before who thought Ada does not have a relatively long and steep learning curve. You'd be the first I've met. Make that at least two, I think Ada's pretty easy to learn. One thing that makes Ada easier is that if you get something wrong, it's usually a syntax error that's caught by the compiler. GNAT's error messages are very good and will often point you the right way. The whole language was designed to try to catch errors at compiler time. Obviously some errors will slip through anyway, but it helps. Ada does have some features that you have to learn about before you can use them. That's true for any language. E.g., it has a task (thread) system built-in; if you want to use it, you'll need to learn it :-).