3 ms·
You aren't required by corporate ethics to be maximally unethical especially when it contravenes the law. Being perceived as unethical towards your workforce ca
by michaelmrose 6y ago
You aren't required by corporate ethics to be maximally unethical especially when it contravenes the law. Being perceived as unethical towards your workforce can furthermore hurt recruiting meaning that after you have begun following the letter and spirit of the law per the courts mandate, even after you pay off the extortionate lawyers,, you now eat higher expenses to acquire and retain a competent workforce.
Its not the best thing for the corp or for the workers. Its a stupid decision.
- matz1 6y ago>You aren't required by corporate ethics to be maximally unethical especially when it contravenes the law agree, I don't expect corporate to be maximally unethical, rather I expect them to be maximally profitable. >Being perceived as unethical towards your workforce can furthermore hurt Agree, but if they can find a way to minimize that perception so that the risk doesn't overweight the benefit then they should.
- pmiller2 6y agoYou are aware that the business judgement rule[0] allows company directors wide latitude in how they run the company, right? I understand expecting companies to make strong efforts to be as profitable as possible, but there is literally no need to do so at the expense of both employees and the company's public image. Rather than trying to "minimize that perception," the simplest way to deal with this type of scenario is to just not do the bad thing. --- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_judgment_rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_judgment_rule
- matz1 6y ago>but there is literally no need to do so at the expense of both employees and the company's public image Thats depends, if the goal is maximal profitability and the cost/risk doing that is minimal then they should do it.