3 ms·
There are published rationales for C90 and C99, but not for C11. (Actually the original rationale is for ANSI C89, which differs from ISO C90 mostly in the way
by _kst_ 6y ago
There are published rationales for C90 and C99, but not for C11.
(Actually the original rationale is for ANSI C89, which differs from ISO C90 mostly in the way the sections are numbered.)
C89: https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/rat/title.html https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/rat/title.html
C99: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10...
- pjmlp 6y agoSure, and it is great the decision that ISO Ada took, I was just pointing that there were others available. I bet most people around here aren't aware of those ones for C.