Potentially destroying the ocean vs spending money to reduce carbon emissions is a no brainer, and it's the job of these scientists to say that out loudly rathe

Potentially destroying the ocean vs spending money to reduce carbon emissions is a no brainer, and it's the job of these scientists to say that out loudly rather than to push for these extreme solution which can produce a blackswan disaster of epic proportions that even money won't be able to save. The arrogance of scientists to "try out my method instead" is at fault since if these scientists were to actually want to save the planet they would push on politicians to spend money rather to try and implement potentialy extremely destructive solutions. In short, you fail to understand that this might create a unfixable disaster, while global warming is obviously solvable by other means since we are far from any kind of an serious crisis, regardless of what "scientists" say. The world is NOT burning yet, which means we can and HAVE TO avoid stupid solutions like dumping iron in the ocean while there are harmless solutions available.