4 ms·
Optimizely Acquired by Episerver
- dang 6y agoComments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24365479 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24365479, which was posted earlier and points to a third party article rather than a corporate press release. Corporate press releases are mostly an exemption from HN's original-source rule (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) because they are mostly evasive, unreadable mush. In this case the third-party article says almost nothing, but at least it's readable. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sort=byDate&type=comment&query=corporate%20press%20release%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
- pmiller2 6y ago@dang, this is a great policy and should be incorporated explicitly into the guidelines, IMO. I would also suggest applying this to scientific articles, given how fluffy university press releases can be, as well.
- dang 6y agoUniversity press releases tend to be better, although they're clearly promotional. The trouble with most scientific papers is that they're highly specialized and, depending on the field, hard for outsiders to read. In those cases we usually recommend submitting the best third-party article and linking to the paper from the comments. A similar category is legal rulings, which came up yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24357078 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24357078
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]