3 ms·
Then the answer is no. I will not pay more taxes indirectly for feelings
by superflit 6y ago
Then the answer is no.
I will not pay more taxes indirectly for feelings
- CraigJPerry 6y agoYawn. Excusing your abdication of personal duty to future generations through hand-wavey ideology. It’s ok for previous generations to pay for the roads that allow you to travel and sell your wares or skills but a tax on your pollution to stave off mass re-settling of people in your lifetime would violate your sensibilities.
- superflit 6y agoI already paid for the "roads" three times and still paying in taxes on fuel.
- asdfasgasdgasdg 6y agoThe answer to what is no? I don't think anyone asked you a question. Many of the most fuel efficient vehicles are relatively cheaper than the less fuel efficient ones. For example, luxury sedans and sports cars tend to be less efficient than economy sedans, but economy sedans are (perhaps obviously from the name) cheaper. So by doing the environmentally efficient thing, you would actually be saving money, not spending more.
- superflit 6y agoYou used a question mark can't you see?
- asdfasgasdgasdg 6y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24361000 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24361000 I don't see any question mark, nor any question.
- superflit 6y agoYou are right I mean to answer to the parent poster. (yes, I can accept I am wrong) :) No hard feelings!