3 ms·
It’s always about the money. USB A ports are either really cheap, or manufacturing the enclosure with the same port on both sides is cheaper. Could also be that
by adamhearn 6y ago
It’s always about the money. USB A ports are either really cheap, or manufacturing the enclosure with the same port on both sides is cheaper. Could also be that the enclosure is a reused enclosure...
- ohazi 6y agoIt's not just the receptacles, it's also 2-4 custom cables per device, with sleeves and overmolds and all that, because it's a non-standard, spec-violating monstrosity that necessarily needs to be included with the cursed switch. I don't understand how that's cheaper than the alternative of paying a few cents more for the correct receptacles and then not even including cables, because the customer can use literally any standard off-the-shelf cable.
- numpad0 6y agoCould very well be mistaken on this, but if I’m right, at some point some USB host port conformance test specified such A-A rollover cable. And also in more recent years, Intel DCI uses A-A 3.0 cable for CPU debugging on tablet PCs. Lesser known but Intel defines USB host controller spec. So not allowed in spec for public use, but not custom cables per se.
- naikrovek 6y agoI seem to remember some windows to windows networking that happened over an A to A USB cable, and I think it came as part of a PC upgrade kit, to allow you to move files from your old device to your new one. So, I'm mildly confident you're right about A-A cables being valid, at least at some point.
- jtl999 6y agoLaplink cable? https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/817dK2e-q9L._AC_SL1500_.jpg https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/817dK2e-q9L... Those have a dongle inside the cable to actually do something useful, versus mindless delivering 5 volts to the other end.
- NickNameNick 6y agoPretty sure those transfer cables were active devices, not just A-A cables.