4 ms·
It is plain as day the current language in the comment is implying Obama was behind it. A clarification to that is pretty far from a nitpick.
by BoorishBears 6y ago
It is plain as day the current language in the comment is implying Obama was behind it. A clarification to that is pretty far from a nitpick.
- Igelau 6y agoPolarizing much? When you get to "or the CIA torturers" back up and find the verb. It's just poor sentence structure.
- versteegen 6y agoI can see your argument that it's ambiguous, but the wrong reading is the most natural one to me. Clarification is justified.
- kelnos 6y agoJust another data point: I read it same as the parent, that the original text was referring to the fact that the Obama administration didn't prosecute the torturers (regardless of when it occurred). It seemed obvious to me that the point being made was that neither party seems to care to hold wrongdoers in government accountable for their actions.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]