> All new skyscrapers will come only in high-growth places, not high-wealth places. IMHO that's because high-wealth places will settle down to generalized unive

> All new skyscrapers will come only in high-growth places, not high-wealth places. IMHO that's because high-wealth places will settle down to generalized universal veto and stagnation. How would we reconcile that prediction with Billionaires Row in Manhattan that was a high-wealth place but not a high-growth place that has built a number of residential skyscrapers recently. What's changed from the example that disproves your hypothesis to the near future?