3 ms·

The standard answer, of course: a war, especially after a national civil war, prosecuting everyone who participated in the enemy's side will be a disaster. Als

• laughinghan 6y ago
  To the extremely limited and minimal extent that whistleblowers have been pardoned, good on that president/governor, but I think it is atrocious that whistleblower protection relies on pardon power—we need much, much stronger protections for whistleblowers, in my opinion. I think 90% of people are basically good but don't really want to stick their neck out of line—which means rules by themselves will never constrain the 5% of people that are malevolent. We need to empower the other 5% of people who are willing to stick their neck out to do the right thing. That includes institutionally empowering whistleblowers. Snowden committed a crime, sure, prosecute him—just give him a fair trial, for goodness' sake.
  • segfaultbuserr 6y ago
    > we need much, much stronger protections for whistleblowers, in my opinion. [...] That includes institutionally empowering whistleblowers. Agreed. Relying on pardoning is at best a stop-gap solution to a broken system.