4 ms·
I did normalize by number of favorites too, so each person had 1 vote shared over all their favorites. The idea that a person who only had one favourite was a r
by tlarkworthy 6y ago
I did normalize by number of favorites too, so each person had 1 vote shared over all their favorites. The idea that a person who only had one favourite was a really strong signal for that single link, whereas people who have lots of favorites are using it differently to what I want to select for.
At some point I had a similar selection of Ask HN dominance. One problem with my data is I only grabbed the first page of favorite results.
EDIT: SHOOT, you exposed a bug, my parser skips things things without URLs! Hence I ended up filtering out most of the Ask HN's!
EDIT: Fixed it
Now my list looks a bit more similar to yours but not quite. Currently "Ask HN: What books changed the way you think about almost everything?", your #1 is my #50. If I turn off normalization, it goes to #13 on my lists, so that has quite a significant impact on the rankings.
sidenote: Lol this post is the 20th most favorited article now.
- kohtatsu 6y agoI'd actually assume one favourite to be a misclick.
- tlarkworthy 6y agoBut those would be randomly distributed so it would not affect the top ranks much.
- FillardMillmore 6y ago> sidenote: Lol this post is the 20th most favorited article now. Would that make this post a meta-favorite?
- tlarkworthy 6y agoI kind of liked the list without Tell/Ask HNs as well (it has the bash shell guide on it) so I made it a toggle.
- comboy 6y ago> The idea that a person who only had one favourite was a really strong signal for that single link Perhaps karma or account age should join the equation.
- tlarkworthy 6y agoYeah, more recent articles should be penalised to normalize for the increased quantity of accounts.