4 ms·
If that were true we wouldn't need crowds to impose influence. Any one individual would be enough to influence any one other individual on the merits of the ar
by austincheney 6y ago
If that were true we wouldn't need crowds to impose influence. Any one individual would be enough to influence any one other individual on the merits of the argument, but that's not how most people operate. Any attempt to influence is a sell no different than selling a hand bag.