3 ms·
Protections on travel do extend to non-pedestrian travel which can be accomplished via non-spot-checked formats. You just have to drive instead of fly. I'm no
by Loughla 6y ago
Protections on travel do extend to non-pedestrian travel which can be accomplished via non-spot-checked formats.
You just have to drive instead of fly.
I'm not trying to be hateful, but your argument just smacks of an 'I want what I want when I want how I want and will not take anything less than all of it' kind of argument.
If you don't want your ID scanned, just drive, or take a train, or a bus. Just don't fly, right?
- occamrazor 6y ago> You just have to drive instead of fly. What about Hawaii? Is there any reasonable alternative to flying?
- Loughla 6y agoA boat? That's not meant to be flippant - that would be an alternative, I'm just not sure about the very subjective definition of 'reasonable'.
- occamrazor 6y agoA boat would be reasonable, maybe, but are there regular ferry services to Hawaii?
- Broken_Hippo 6y agoAnd don't get pulled over for any reason, since they'll probably ask for your ID and your passengers. It doesn't matter if it is illegal: If they can't do it, you are in for a bad day, even if they let you go at the end.
- R0b0t1 6y agoAccepting the partial abrogation of rights eventually leads to ceding even more. It is extremely important to reject half measures.
- kevin_thibedeau 6y agoIf your freedoms are subject to someone else deciding when you can exercise them you were never free to begin with.