4 ms·
I'm generally against property being taken in association with crimes. Particularly by police without supporting paperwork and oversight. But in this case: "Sh
by 8bitsrule 6y ago
I'm generally against property being taken in association with crimes. Particularly by police without supporting paperwork and oversight. But in this case:
"She was in the passenger seat when a state trooper clocked her car at 118 miles per hour on I-94 in St. Paul.
When the driver ... refused a breathalyzer, he was arrested on suspicion of DWI..."
She was able to buy the car back. Drunk drivers cause many injuries and deaths. What happened to this country is that we decided that thousands of drunks on the road was not acceptable. MADD was founded in 1980 to get that fixed. Whatever it takes.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- jqvincent16 6y ago“She was able to buy the car back.” Think about that for a minute. A state sanctioned gang decided her car, that she owned, was no longer her property. Then they were graceful enough to allow her to buy back her stolen property. It’s absolutely disgusting and unacceptable in modern society. People like you who rationalize this behavior make me sick.