3 ms·
This. If you allow capitalism to absorb the government itself, what you get is for-profit persecution. If crime generates income, be it through asset forfeiture
by endymi0n 6y ago
This. If you allow capitalism to absorb the government itself, what you get is for-profit persecution. If crime generates income, be it through asset forfeiture, private prisons or a law system where you can win by just making the case big enough the other side can't pay defending the case, you align the incentives towards finding crime where there is none.
It's no surprise the US has the highest prison population per capita in all the developed world and nobody trusts cops.
The US is an interesting experiment in what you get if you try to run a government on market forces, but I prefer to live in a country where police don't have to earn their own income, but are civil servants, tenured for life.
That may lead to inefficiencies, fine, but at least the incentives are aligned towards helping out and preventing crime instead of generating more of it. I haven't had a single instance I can remember where I was ever scared by police.
- jliptzin 6y agoWhat country are you in?
- rootusrootus 6y agoAccording to a recent post, they are in Germany.
- dougmwne 6y agoI have a number of European friends and they can't even wrap their heads around the USA's policing and crime issues. It's literally a foreign concept to them. Their attitude seems to be, "You're so rich. How could you get this so wrong?" I'd say you get it better than most, just add a big scoop of institutional racism and you're there. In the spirit of HN, I'm not trying to push a political opinion, but just to explain that to the BLM protesters, this is their reality.