> What are you talking about? That's basically the process. How do you know? > But you'd only have some inconsequential pedantic details to change. No, the w

> What are you talking about? That's basically the process. How do you know? > But you'd only have some inconsequential pedantic details to change. No, the writer completely misunderstands the entire purpose of the process, and consequently just makes up details about what the writer thinks ought to be happening. It sounds like more of a hypothetical than actual knowledge.