> Of course not, but those should be shifted to the taxes and fees for corresponding services. At the very least, the argument against doing that is so that yo

> Of course not, but those should be shifted to the taxes and fees for corresponding services. At the very least, the argument against doing that is so that you, as a homeowner don't have to manage an additional 10-20 accounts to pay the monthly bill for all those services. It creates an administrative overhead that isn't necessary, and would just siphon more money into the bureaucratic machine rather than fixing issues. That's why taxes are bundled and usually pay for a bunch of things at once, rather than having to pay separately for every little thing. It may sound nice as a libertarian thought experiment, but there's a reason it's almost never done in practice.