4 ms·
Calculating state support as a percentage of total cost is misleading, since universities can make "total cost" be whatever they please. California spends 34% m
by apsec112 6y ago
Calculating state support as a percentage of total cost is misleading, since universities can make "total cost" be whatever they please. California spends 34% more on higher education than it did in 1975, adjusted both for inflation and for state population growth. If a university wants their budget to double, and the state won't double their funding, then the remainder will have to come from tuition. But that's not the state's fault, it's the universities' fault for spending more.
(Sources:
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1975/01_transmittal_1975.pdf https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1975/01_transmittal_1975.pdf
http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/2019-20/pdf/Enacted/BudgetSummary/FullBudgetSummary.pdf http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/2019-20/pdf/Enacted/BudgetSummary/...
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California)
- secabeen 6y ago34% is a decent number, but that includes both Community Colleges, Cal State Schools and UC, all of which have opened additional locations in the last 45 years, as more and more jobs in the state require a college education. If you want to accuse the universities of spending more, do you have data to back up that assertion that they are spending significantly more on a real, per-student basis?