3 ms·
> With RedHat going after Docker itself with their daemonless version of Docker, podman Nobody cares about Podman except Red Hat and their most loyal fans. I'd
by zapita 6y ago
> With RedHat going after Docker itself with their daemonless version of Docker, podman
Nobody cares about Podman except Red Hat and their most loyal fans. I'd be surprised if podman has managed to steal more than 1% of Docker's install base.
> docker-ce's lack of cgroupsv2 support
containerd supports cgroupsv2. Docker CE is based on containerd. If the current release doesn't have it, the next release will.
> Docker Enterprise having to compete with K8S
Docker Enterprise includes a K8S distribution. Does it compete with itself?
> multiple entrenched container registry companies (eg Quay)
Quay is not a company. It is a CoreOS (now Red Hat) product.
> it must be tough at Docker Inc.
I believe that's true. Just not for any of the reasons you have given.
- searchableguy 6y ago> Nobody cares about Podman except Red Hat and their most loyal fans. I'd be surprised if podman has managed to steal more than 1% of Docker's install base. This seems dismissive. Podman has many neat features that docker doesn't (pods) or were added later (rootless containers). https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/01/29/podman-kubernetes-yaml/ https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/01/29/podman-kuberne... https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/01/15/podman-managing-containers-pods https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/01/15/podman-managin... Obviously, you can use kompose and docker-compose but I would argue podman has better experience.
- zapita 6y agoI'm not dismissing how good it is, just how popular it is. Definitely not popular enough to threaten Docker's adoption, not even close. Docker does have problems, but Podman is not one of them.