20 ms·
This is just proof that not everyone is following the same narrative that you’re personally following or understands reality the same way you do. It’s beyond m
by whoisjuan 6y ago
This is just proof that not everyone is following the same narrative that you’re personally following or understands reality the same way you do.
It’s beyond me how that job post would make sense to anyone besides someone who is disconnected from the usual contending rhetorics Amazon is involved in.
Nobody raised a flag on how that would look like for them? You gotta be pretty oblivious to read that and say “yeah that looks good to me”.
I’m not even discrediting the value or purpose of that particular position since I have zero context besides the ad but I don’t understand how can you sprinkle those terms and reference those specific groups without reflecting deeply how it could be perceived.
- ryanmarsh 6y agoAre you commenting on the optics or the ethics? In a broader context, I don’t understand how others see this as a victory. As if taking the job post down means it’s not still part of their strategy.
- whoisjuan 6y agoMainly on the optics. I know that’s shallow but I’m commenting on how it looks because perhaps that’s a symptom of something deeper. Maybe people involved on these projects are so oblivious that it never occurred to them that they may be contributing to something that could be borderline unethical. What’s kind of ridiculous about this is that you can tell these job requirements were written by a lawyer or similar. People that are trained and presumed to have a somewhat acute skill to evaluate the ethical complexities of a situation.
- tallgiraffe 6y ago"This just proof that not everyone is following the same narrative that you’re personally following." Your post is a perfect recursive function.
- whoisjuan 6y agohahaha