3 ms·
Funny, I never said "only voting". I also said you have a voice, use it. You seem to have completely ignored that paragraph. Perhaps you'd like to take a shot
by jlawson 6y ago
Funny, I never said "only voting". I also said you have a voice, use it. You seem to have completely ignored that paragraph.
Perhaps you'd like to take a shot at actually responding to what I wrote.
It is absolutely possible to protest without hurting innocent bystanders.
- sudosysgen 6y agoIf your standard for "hurting innocent bystanders" is to mildly inconvenience some people by causing them to seek an alternative route, then no, it's not possible to have an effective protest under that standard. The right to protest is generally accepted to mean that people are allowed to walk in the street in an effort to be heard. I responded to what you wrote, and your arguments fall flat. Even during massive protests with millions of people ambulances get where they need to get and doctors go where they need to go.
- jlawson 6y agoWhen you're blocked on the highway, you cannot leave. You're confined. No matter how sick you are, how hungry the baby is, how hot the car is getting, how low on gas or how late you are for work. Stop being disingenous about what you're advocating. You're advocating confining people to their cars on the highway. Including old people, little kids, sick people. To force them to listen to you.
- msla 6y ago> If your standard for "hurting innocent bystanders" is to mildly inconvenience some people No, the standard is potentially killing people.