3 ms·
You want them to think "is this interesting and on-topic for HN?" My earlier proposal (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2242453 http://news.ycombinator.com/
by keyist 16y ago
You want them to think "is this interesting and on-topic for HN?"
My earlier proposal (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2242453 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2242453 ): deduct karma from submitter and _anyone who upvoted_ on submissions that were successfully flagged. That should get people to think the way you mention not only when submitting, but when upvoting as well.
Improve the submissions and comments will naturally improve -- submissions that are one-sided/gossipy/demagogic tend to attract similar comments. Whereas submissions full of technical content are often rich with links to further reading, contrasting viewpoints with cited evidence, etc. (Disclaimer: observations in this paragraph may be subject to fundamental attribution error).
- T-R 16y agoI think there would need to be a little more to associate the action with the punishment. Since the point deduction would be pretty delayed from the voting, voters might not recognize which votes were poorly placed, and wouldn't learn to place better votes.