4 ms·
I will wait for benchmarks. Their 2x qualifier was RTX On. Not sure if they meant general performance or RTX performance only.
by arvinsim 6y ago
I will wait for benchmarks. Their 2x qualifier was RTX On. Not sure if they meant general performance or RTX performance only.
- Nursie 6y agoHe was trying to sell it as double the RTX, double the tensor cores and double the general raster capability. Guess the benchmarks will show us.
- PaulBGD_ 6y agoThe small text also said DLSS iirc, so non-dlss games and machine learning loads probably aren't 2x.
- BearOso 6y agoThe 3070 has 20 classic shading module TFLOPs. The 2080ti was 13.5 TFLOPs. I think you’ll see 50% better performance at the minimum.
- chinigo 6y agoDigital Foundry's initial analysis mostly bears this claim out. They found FPS increases of between 160-190% for a bunch of recent games featuring both RTX/traditional rendering, and about a fixed 190% in Quake RTX (which is exclusively RTX rendering). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWD01yUQdVA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWD01yUQdVA
- bradlys 6y agoThose titles were all cherry-picked by Nvidia though. I would be very hesitant about the data used. A lot of DLSS used too - so, not even true 4K. On top of that - if you only care about 4K gaming then fine - but what if you're more of a 1080-1440p with higher refresh rate person? Personally, I have a 1440p display that goes to 144hz. I'd much rather have 1440p @ 100+ FPS than 4K at 60 - but we don't know what these new GPUs will do.