3 ms·
This article is ridiculous. It makes a bunch of unfounded assumptions and provides very little in the way of facts to support its claims. Did anyone actually re
by hoorayimhelping 6y ago
This article is ridiculous. It makes a bunch of unfounded assumptions and provides very little in the way of facts to support its claims. Did anyone actually read the job postings before jumping to conclusions?
>Monitor various collection platforms for incidents that pose direct and indirect risk to Amazon operations, personnel, or brand;
There is nothing in there about union busting or making sure employees don't organize. This author is naive to think that Amazon isn't dealing with state level threats. They likely need state level intelligence.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200901125940/https://www.amazon.jobs/en/jobs/1026060/intelligence-analyst https://web.archive.org/web/20200901125940/https://www.amazo...
https://web.archive.org/web/20200901142713/https://www.amazon.jobs/en/jobs/1213610/sr-intelligence-analyst https://web.archive.org/web/20200901142713/https://www.amazo...
- Jasper_ 6y ago> There is nothing in there about union busting or making sure employees don't organize. Literally from your own link: > Analysts must be capable of engaging and informing L7+ ER Principals (attorney stakeholders) on sensitive topics that are highly confidential, including labor organizing threats against the company (emphasis mine)