3 ms·

I didn't say the project was undertaken, but it was real enough for someone to come up with the idea, ballpark the cost of it, write up the proposal and have a

I didn't say the project was undertaken, but it was real enough for someone to come up with the idea, ballpark the cost of it, write up the proposal and have a bunch of presumably high-paid decision-makers read it in order to come to the conclusion that it's just a little bit too ridiculous. That's all on the tax dollar. Of course, of all the egregious military research that has been undertaken, that one is just a whimsical side note. It could serve as a red herring even without any conspiracy theorist. I'd certainly sleep easier believing that the military is busy researching the gay bomb instead of the doomsday device.

krapp 6y ago
>but it was real enough for someone to come up with the idea, ballpark the cost of it, write up the proposal and have a bunch of presumably high-paid decision-makers read it in order to come to the conclusion that it's just a little bit too ridiculous. That's all on the tax dollar. A research laboratory speculated about possible areas of nonlethal chemical weapons research, and created a three page proposal, among which was a reference to what would be called the "gay bomb." That's their job. Here is the proposal[0]. That's how "real" the "gay bomb" was - a single brief paragraph on the second page. This isn't "egregious military research," it's a step above a doodle scribbled onto a napkin that someone else threw into the wastebasket. [0]https://web.archive.org/web/20060502201217if_/http://www.sunshine-project.org:80/incapacitants/jnlwdpdf/wpafbchem.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20060502201217if_/http://www.sun...