3 ms·
The "completely deniable" part is not necessary for steganography. Otherwise, you dismiss just about any examples of steganography prior to steganography on co
by Beldin 6y ago
The "completely deniable" part is not necessary for steganography.
Otherwise, you dismiss just about any examples of steganography prior to steganography on computers.
Which is fine, but as far as i know, not the commonly accepted definition.
- chrisseaton 6y agoThe question was > so why bother The answer is - because it's more deniable. You bother because more deniable is better.