3 ms·
Learning anything for me always follows this sort of structure (I'm sure someone will tell me there's some well known name for this because it seems so "self ob
by glaberficken 6y ago
Learning anything for me always follows this sort of structure (I'm sure someone will tell me there's some well known name for this because it seems so "self obvious").
Step0: Select the simplest achievable task in the domain of the new thing you are trying to learn.
Step1: Gather all the stuff you think you will be needing to accomplish the task (tools, materials, software, instructions, time!, etc).
Step2: Hit a road-block. It can be the lack of an indispensable tool or a lack of knowledge of a particular detail.
Step3: Fix the blocker (fill the knowledge gap about the new detail, buy/borrow the missing tool). If multiple roadblocks: Solve the one that seems most fundamental first; If stuck at blocker: seek help from others, sleep on it, give up (some things are too hard with your present knowledge).
Step4: If task still not completed GOTO Step3; If task completed: Select a new more advanced task and GOTO Step2.
- fxtentacle 6y agoMy way of learning is the opposite. I pick a task that is incredibly cool and motivating and surely way out of my skill set. Then I try to find examples by true masters of things that turned out similar. Then I try to imitate what I can from them. In the end, my result is very so-so in comparison with the masters, but I still feel happy about having learned many useful things.