> No where does the article extend that definition to anything vaguely measurable. Ah, you're right, I didn't realize you dropped the "speed of" in the "speed

> No where does the article extend that definition to anything vaguely measurable. Ah, you're right, I didn't realize you dropped the "speed of" in the "speed of causality" (because the "speed of causality" can be measured and expected... what does "expected" even mean in this context?!). So going 2 replies up you linked to Causality and made a statement about causality but ignored the "speed of causality". So nothing was said? So you agree with me! > It was most likely edited hours before your reply. When I completed the edit there were no replies. Ah! Don't worry, thankfully we know that I replied to you 35 minutes later thanks to Hackernew's API[0][1] and that I'm half a world closer in SGT, and that I was originally replying to something that was edited away. [0] https://hacker-news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/24328890.json?print=pretty https://hacker-news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/24328890.json?pri... [1] https://hacker-news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/24329038.json?print=pretty https://hacker-news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/24329038.json?pri...