3 ms·
Exactly. This is equivalent to the "we have to convert to electric cars because of climate change!" which will also barely make a dent in carbon emissions (unl
by seehafer 6y ago
Exactly.
This is equivalent to the "we have to convert to electric cars because of climate change!" which will also barely make a dent in carbon emissions (unlike, say, converting the world to nuclear power plants).
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- AstralStorm 6y agoIt would make more of a dent than consumer restrictions on water, estimated 8% with current power generation, more with cleaner, up to 20%. That said, replacing long distance haul with electrified rail transport would be yet better.
- bsder 6y ago> This is equivalent to the "we have to convert to electric cars because of climate change!" which will also barely make a dent in carbon emissions Even if electric cars were carbon-equivalent, moving a million point sources of pollution (internal combustion engines) to a single point source of pollution (a power plant) is way better for us all.